User blog comment:Lord Andrew Mallace/Act of Parliament: Concerns towards the EITC/@comment-7085133-20150731152038

To whom it may concern,

My name is William Goldsilver. I used to be the Lord Chancellor of the EITC, or so I was informed. This was along time ago when everything was still smooth in the EITC community. I am quite sorry for my leave of absence. I am a Technical Sergeant in the United States Air Force Auxiliary, and I am preparing a resume for the Air Force Academy, so I have been very busy doing Search and Rescue missions, ETC. In Mr. Brawlmartin's latest videos, I was called General, so I will call myself that until someone speaks to me otherwise. I am a loyal British soldier, and will listen to any executive decisions given to me by higher ups. I am in no way imparting treason when I say nay, so please, before anyone sends me hate mail, listen to my reasoning.

People get used to certain leaders. I should know. I am the drill sergeant of my squadron. When our Commander left for college, everything was in dissary. We didn't know what to do with out him. We were used to his voice.

I am not saying that The House of Lords could not adequately run the EITC branch. They could. They would do a fine job. My only question is, is there a point? I understand treason, I understand why you wish to get rid of him. Could you not, however, demote him to Second in Command of the EITC, ( Whatever you now call it ) and put your own man as Lord Marshall, and when ( if ) Samuel is deemed fit to lead again, he may. Just my thoughts on how to mutually solve this argument in a way it may please both parties.

Whatever your decision, I will stand by the British. Always have. Always will.

Also, Prime Minister Goldtimbers, and your Majesty, if you could add me on Skype at William_Goldsilver ( Your Majesty, I believe I already have Your contact information ) so we could talk about my leave of absence further, and why I was gone.

Respectfully signed, General William Goldsilver

-NAY