Board Thread:His Majesty's High Court of Justice/@comment-4266719-20160521222314

21 MAY 1749 

WESTMINSTER HALL

OFFICE OF THE CHANCELLORY;

MINISTRY OF INJUSTICE

IN HIS MAJESTY'S COURT, THIS 21ST MAY IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD, 1749, The Lord Chancellor does hereby authorize investigate methods to be used to inquire about recent act of the Lord Speaker of the House of Lords, The Right Honourable Earl Grey, Lord Joseph Archibald Grey.

Below are the preliminary court documents for the opening of this inquiry, as requested by the Prime Minister:

"But, unfortunately Sir Joseph Grey did attempt to negotiate with the cyber-terrorist as I may more correctly label him as; he is also the reason this wonderful declaration of a new era exists with him and myself being named administrators of along side Pearson.

He disobeyed direct orders to say nothing when asked if we would agree with Pearson's proposals. He felt the incentive to speak on everyone's behalf simply because I remained silent and as if he truly represented you all with the best interests at heart. There is no interest that is related to Pearson that could be remotely considered to be the best course of action unless that interest is to avoid him, ignore him, ban him, or shun him from the real POTCO role-play, and not his deluded version he claims is true. History is not written by one man. History is written by the victors, and I see no victory in siding with someone who has the ability to DDoS others and threaten them on a now a physical level rather than a virtual level."

In short, the speaker is accused of collaborating with Pearson with ill-willed intentions. He did not take into account the community decision and lacked any hindsight for potential consequences, despite Pearson being our most dangerous adversary. Shortly after, war was declared in part due to the terrible miscommunication that Sir Joseph Grey potential caused.

Below is evidence from the declaration which alleges Sir Joseph Grey's involvement, as well as the Prime Minister and James Goldtimbers, who have already been vindicated and cleared of all charges in the matter:



Mr. Grey is entitled to due process and has indicated that he wishes to have Barrister to accompany him as his judicial representative.

BASED ON THE ABOVE EVIDENCE, THE CHARGES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
 * Seditious Libel: in accordance with the English Defamation Law, level three offence.
 * High treason: a most heinous act against HM's Government, a breach of the HM Treason Act of 1708, level 5 offence.
 * Collaborating with the Enemy: level 4 offence
 * Conspiracy to Commit High Treason: level 4 offence
 * Conspiracy to Endanger The Commonwealth: level 3 offence - due to the War declaration that happened shortly after.

For the duration of this on-going investigation, the Speaker will hereby suspend his post within Parliament and the Cabinet Committee of the Privy Council. This trial has presented the opening case and will try each of the charges until a non-guilty or guilty verdict has been reached, followed by sentencing if and to what extent necessary. Everyone will be allowed to post evidence and their opinion in this post, but I ask that priority be given to the defense to provide their opening statement.

THE FINAL VERDICT WILL BE DECIDED BY THE CABINET COMMITTEE PRIVY COUNCIL, with the exception that the Lord Chancellor's vote and Prime Minister's vote count as 3 votes within themselves. Parliament may also hold a vote to condemn or commend the verdict.

I hereby declare this tribunal open - present arguments, screenshots, and facts to prove whatever side you feel is more factually compelling. Sir Grey is assumed innocent until proven guilty by this judicial proceeding.

Rule Britannia,  