User blog comment:William Brawlmaritn/Faults of the English & It's King/@comment-4573076-20150806223357

I don't understand why all of the following individuals below feel it necessary to defend someone (John Breasly) who was inactive for almost the whole entirety of their nation's existence. John is not fit to rule. Mallace and Garland couldn't care less about this community or anyone in it, so nothing they say should carry any water.

During The Paradoxian War, Garland, Breasly, Goldtimbers, the whole lot were in The Paradox. At the time, they openly said that they'd surrendered. I can pull up the logs on John's Talk Page on the PPW if I need to. Samuel, and William never surrendered. They remained in Co. Black Guard. After the war was over, all of Britain poured back into Samuel's guild. Point being, he was the last man standing in your country. Show some respect at the very least.

Roleplay thrived under people like Leon and Samuel because it was done on the game, where it belongs. People like Garland, John, and Mallace knew that their skills weren't particularly applicable in the game itself so they remained on the wiki where they wrote make believe stories, and argued like three stoic philosophers lost in apathy. I.E. ~ The Roleplay Council, I.E. ~ Trying to elect leaders of countries whereas not only did said country already have a leader, but all of the members of said country were banned and therefore unable to vocalize their opinions. (Russia) ~ P.S. this is what started The Paradoxian War in the first place. So if you want to blame someone, blame those three morons. Ironically, halfway through the war, the three that started it were all in The Paradox saying "I surrender, I surrender", while Samuel was left trying to clean up the mess they'd created.

As if three years of defeat after defeat isn't enough to bring light to the fact that Breasly is a terrible leader.